Hot Bench Season 7 Episode 29 Car Salesman Softie Accused of Extortion?!; Bargain Babysitting Deal of the Century!

In the Hot Bench season 7 episode 29 titled "Car Salesman Softie Accused of Extortion?!; Bargain Babysitting Deal of the Century!", Judge Tanya Acker, Judge Patricia DiMango, and Judge Michael Corriero preside over two different cases.

In the first case, a car salesman is accused of extortion by a former customer who claims that the salesman took advantage of his kindness and soft-heartedness. The customer had purchased a car from the salesman but was struggling to make the payments. He claims that the salesman took advantage of his kind nature by offering to let him skip payments in exchange for performing various tasks, such as cleaning his house and doing his laundry. The customer says that he felt pressured to comply with the salesman's demands and eventually had to stop due to the increasing demands and lack of time.

The salesman argues that he was simply trying to help the customer and never demanded anything in exchange for skipping payments. He claims that he even gave the customer time extensions and tried to work with him to help him keep his car.

In the second case, two friends enter into a babysitting arrangement that ends in a dispute. One friend agreed to watch the other friend's child for a discounted rate in exchange for a favor. However, when the favor was not completed, the babysitter friend demanded the full rate rather than the discounted rate they had agreed upon. The mother argues that the babysitter friend was unfair in changing the agreement and not honoring the original deal.

The babysitter friend defends herself by stating that the favor was an important part of their agreement and that she felt justified in increasing the rate when it was not completed. She argues that the discounted rate was contingent on the favor and without it, the rate should be the normal rate for babysitting.

As Judge Acker, Judge DiMango, and Judge Corriero hear both cases, they must determine the validity of the claims and determine how to proceed with each dispute. With each case presenting unique circumstances and varying claims, the judges must use their experience and knowledge to reach a fair verdict in each case.

Overall, the episode explores the themes of trust, fairness, and the importance of honoring agreements. Through the disputes presented, viewers are shown the complexities that can arise when agreements are not honored and the need for clear communication and understanding in any arrangement.