The People's Court Season 17 Episode 49 You Bought a Car Without Seeing It First?

The People's Court season 17 episode 49, titled "You Bought a Car Without Seeing It First?", follows the case of two individuals who entered into a verbal agreement to sell and purchase a vehicle. The plaintiff claims that he paid the defendant $2,000 for the car, but when he went to pick it up, he discovered that it had a cracked windshield, a rusted body, and numerous mechanical issues that the defendant had not disclosed. The plaintiff asserts that he was misled by the defendant, who assured him that the car was in good condition and that he could pick it up at any time.

The defendant, on the other hand, argues that he did not deceive the plaintiff and that he disclosed all known issues with the car. He claims that the plaintiff agreed to purchase the car without viewing it first and that he cannot be held responsible for any issues that arose after the sale. The defendant states that he is willing to refund the plaintiff's money, but only if he returns the car in the same condition in which he received it.

Judge Marilyn Milian presides over the case and listens to testimony and evidence from both parties. She questions the plaintiff about why he agreed to purchase a car without seeing it first and why he did not inspect the car before paying for it. The plaintiff explains that he trusted the defendant, who he had known for several years, and believed that he was getting a good deal on a reliable car. He admits that he made a mistake in not inspecting the car first but argues that the defendant misled him about the car's condition.

Judge Milian also questions the defendant about why he did not disclose all known issues with the car to the plaintiff. The defendant states that he did tell the plaintiff about some of the issues but did not mention the cracked windshield or rusted body. He claims that the plaintiff should have inspected the car before paying for it and that he is not responsible for any issues that arose afterward.

After hearing both sides of the case, Judge Milian makes a determination based on the evidence and testimony provided. She considers the verbal agreement between the parties, the condition of the car, and any disclosures made by the defendant. Judge Milian ultimately decides whether the plaintiff is entitled to a refund or if he must keep the car in its current condition.

Throughout the episode, the audience is able to observe the legal process and the reasoning behind Judge Milian's decisions. The show provides an educational opportunity for viewers to learn about the legal system and the way in which disputes are resolved in a court of law. The episode emphasizes the importance of honesty and openness in business transactions and the consequences that come with failing to disclose known issues. Overall, "You Bought a Car Without Seeing It First?" offers an engaging and informative look at the legal system and the way in which it functions to resolve disputes between individuals.