The People's Court Season 21 Episode 76 Raging at a Real Estate Broker
- February 5, 2018
The People's Court season 21 episode 76 entitled "Raging at a Real Estate Broker" centers around a case between a plaintiff and a real estate broker. In this episode, the plaintiff is accusing the broker of deceptive practices and breach of contract in a real estate transaction. The plaintiff claims that the broker misled them about the condition of the property they were interested in purchasing, and that they later discovered several defects that were not disclosed to them.
The episode begins with both parties presenting their case to Judge Marilyn Milian, who has presided over the show for several years. The plaintiff argues that the broker failed to disclose several key issues with the property, such as a damaged roof and faulty plumbing. They claim that they only found out about these issues after the sale had gone through, and that they were never given the opportunity to inspect the property themselves before making an offer.
The real estate broker, on the other hand, maintains that they did nothing wrong and that the plaintiff was fully informed about the condition of the property. They argue that the plaintiff had an opportunity to inspect the property before making an offer, and that they chose to move forward with the purchase despite any issues they may have discovered.
As the case progresses, Judge Milian listens to both sides and asks probing questions to get to the bottom of what happened. She examines the evidence and hears from witnesses, including a home inspector who had inspected the property prior to the sale. The inspector testifies that they had noted several issues with the property, but that they were not severe enough to prevent the sale from proceeding.
Throughout the episode, tensions rise between the plaintiff and the defendant, with both sides becoming increasingly heated in their arguments. At one point, the plaintiff accuses the broker of lying and trying to take advantage of them, while the broker accuses the plaintiff of being unwilling to take responsibility for their own mistakes. Despite these verbal conflicts, Judge Milian manages to keep the proceedings on track and maintains a calm, measured demeanor.
Eventually, Judge Milian delivers her verdict, which is based on the evidence presented throughout the episode. Without spoiling the outcome, it can be said that the verdict is fair and just, and provides closure for both parties.
Overall, the episode provides an engaging and informative look at the challenges of real estate transactions, and the importance of proper disclosure and transparency. It also showcases Judge Milian's skills as a judge and mediator, as she navigates a complex case with a great deal of patience and wisdom.