The People's Court Season 26 Episode 17 You Poisoned My Dog

In this episode of The People's Court, a woman named Lisa is suing her former friend, Arthur, over allegations that he purposely poisoned her dog. Lisa claims that Arthur was jealous of her close relationship with her dog and did everything in his power to make her pet sick. She says that after noticing her dog acting strangely, she took him to the vet several times, but learned that the animal had ingested a toxic substance.

Arthur denies any wrongdoing and insists that he would never harm an animal. He claims that Lisa's dog became ill after eating a poisonous plant in her garden, which she failed to properly supervise. According to Arthur, he even helped Lisa take care of her dog during its illness and took it to the vet himself.

The judge listens to both sides of the story and reviews the evidence presented in court. Lisa brings in vet bills and medical records to support her case, which show the extent of her dog's illness and treatment. Meanwhile, Arthur argues that he was a close friend to Lisa and would never do anything to harm her or her pet.

As the case unfolds, the judge asks both parties some tough questions and tries to get to the bottom of what really happened to Lisa's dog. The evidence is inconclusive, however, and the judge must make a decision based on the credibility of the testimony presented in court.

In the end, the judge renders a verdict based on the evidence and testimony given in court. He must determine whether Arthur is responsible for Lisa's dog's illness or if there was another explanation for the animal's sickness. The tension is high as the judge delivers his decision, and both Lisa and Arthur wait anxiously to hear the outcome of the case.

Overall, this episode of The People's Court offers a compelling look at a complex legal case involving allegations of animal cruelty and personal betrayal. Viewers will be on the edge of their seats as they watch the judge navigate the difficult terrain of this dispute and come to a conclusion that is both fair and just.