The People's Court Season 26 Episode 7 Pet Sitting Problems

In season 26, episode 7 of The People's Court, viewers are greeted with a case that revolves around pet sitting problems. The episode starts with a plaintiff who is suing her friend, the defendant, for breach of contract.

The plaintiff had gone on vacation for a week and asked her friend to pet sit for her during her absence. According to the plaintiff, the defendant did not take proper care of her pets. She claimed that when she returned from vacation, she found her pets underfed and dehydrated. One of her pets had even contracted an infection that required medical attention.

The defendant, on the other hand, claimed that she had taken good care of the pets. She argued that she had fed them properly and followed all the instructions given to her by the plaintiff. The defendant also claimed that the pet that had contracted an infection was already sick before she started pet sitting.

Judge Marilyn Milian listens to both sides of the story closely and decides to ask some pointed questions. She wants to know if the defendant has any experience in taking care of pets. The defendant responds by saying that she loves animals and takes care of pets all the time. She also claims that the pet that got an infection was already sick before she started taking care of it.

Judge Milian then asks the plaintiff if she had left clear instructions for the defendant about how to take care of her pets. The plaintiff says that she did and even left a list of important numbers that the defendant could call in case of an emergency.

The Judge, however, points out that the plaintiff had not communicated one important fact with the defendant. She had not told her friend that one of her pets was already under medication. The defendant was unaware of this fact and had not given the pet the required dosage during her care. This caused the animal to develop an infection that required medical attention.

At this point, Judge Milian turns to the defendant and explains to her that, as a pet sitter, one should always ask questions and get all the information about the pets they are taking care of. She then turns to the plaintiff and advises her to always communicate important details such as a pet's health condition with the pet sitter.

In conclusion, Judge Milian ruled in favor of the plaintiff and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff for the medical bills incurred by the sick pet. The defendant was also asked to provide a written apology to the plaintiff for her actions.

The case of pet sitting problems may sound simple, but there are many lessons to be learned from it. It highlights the importance of communication when it comes to pet care and how being a responsible pet sitter requires paying close attention to the needs of the animals. The People's Court continues to provide viewers with valuable insights into real-life legal issues that we face every day.