Hot Bench Season 5 Episode 153 Spartan Race to the Altar!; Apartment Shoot Out!

In this episode of Hot Bench, titled "Spartan Race to the Altar!; Apartment Shoot Out!," Judge Tanya Acker presides over two cases alongside Judges Patricia DiMango and Michael Corriero.

The first case involves a couple who met during a Spartan Race and quickly became engaged. However, their wedding plans were derailed when the groom-to-be's ex-wife accused him of not paying child support. The couple is now suing the ex-wife for ruining their wedding plans and causing emotional distress. The ex-wife, on the other hand, claims that she was simply seeking what was owed to her and her children.

The judges listen to both sides and try to determine the validity of the couple's claim. They weigh the emotional distress caused by the cancelled wedding against the ex-wife's legal right to collect child support. Judge DiMango questions the couple's decision to sue, asking if it would not be more productive to simply pay the child support and move on. Judge Acker focuses on the ex-wife's actions and whether or not they were malicious. Judge Corriero examines the legality of the situation and the potential implications of ruling in favor of the couple.

The second case involves a shooting that occurred in an apartment complex. A woman was hit by a stray bullet while sleeping in her bed. She is suing the apartment complex for failing to provide adequate security and for allowing dangerous tenants to reside in the complex. The apartment complex argues that they cannot be held responsible for criminal activity and that they took reasonable steps to ensure resident safety.

The judges listen to the woman's story and the evidence presented. They explore the concept of landlord responsibility and whether or not the complex had reasonable security measures in place. They also examine the criminal activity in the area and whether or not the complex could have foreseen the shooting. Judge DiMango suggests that the woman may have a stronger case if she was able to identify the individual who fired the shot. Judge Acker questions the responsibility of the complex and whether or not they took reasonable measures to prevent criminal activity.

As with all cases on Hot Bench, the judges deliberate and come to a conclusion based on the evidence presented. The episode showcases the unique format of Hot Bench, which allows for three judges to weigh in and provide different perspectives on each case. Through their discussions, viewers are able to gain a deeper understanding of the legal principles at play and the complexities of each case.