Hot Bench Season 7 Episode 118 Disabled and Defrauded?!

In Hot Bench season 7 episode 118 titled "Disabled and Defrauded?!", Judge Tanya Acker, Judge Patricia DiMango, and Judge Michael Corriero take on a case where a woman claims she was defrauded by her former business partner out of tens of thousands of dollars. The plaintiff, who is disabled and uses a wheelchair, alleges that she and the defendant agreed to start a home healthcare business together, but the defendant never followed through on his end of the deal. She claims that he took her money and used it for personal expenses instead of investing it in the business.

The defendant denies the allegations and claims that the plaintiff was never actually disabled and that she was able to do things like walk and drive a car. He argues that she just used her disability as a way to gain sympathy and support for her lawsuit.

As the judges hear testimony from both sides, they try to determine the truth of what happened. They question the plaintiff about why she didn't do more due diligence and research on the defendant before entering into a business partnership with him. They also ask the defendant about his financial records and whether he can prove that the money he received from the plaintiff was actually used for personal expenses.

Throughout the case, tensions run high between the plaintiff and defendant. At one point, the defendant accuses the plaintiff of lying and faking her disability. The plaintiff becomes emotional and expresses frustration at her lack of financial and emotional support.

In the end, the judges must decide who they believe is telling the truth and whether the plaintiff has sufficient evidence to prove that she was defrauded. They also have to consider how much weight they should give to the defendant's claims about the plaintiff's disability and credibility.

Overall, "Disabled and Defrauded?!" is a dramatic episode that highlights the challenges faced by people with disabilities who are trying to start businesses or pursue financial opportunities. It also raises important questions about trust, due diligence, and the nature of business partnerships. As always, the judges bring their wisdom and expertise to bear on the case, making for a compelling and thought-provoking hour of television.