Hot Bench Season 5 Episode 36 Lamest Girls' Trip Ever?!; Child Causes Flood?!

The episode "Lamest Girls' Trip Ever?!; Child Causes Flood?!" from season 5 of Hot Bench features the signature three-judge panel presiding over two unique cases.

In the first case, a group of friends take a trip to Las Vegas, but tensions rise when one member fails to contribute equally to the shared expenses. Judge Patricia DiMango questions whether the group had a clear agreement on how expenses would be split, while Judge Tanya Acker questions the motives of the friend who appears to have deliberately avoided paying her share. Judge Michael Corriero wonders whether the plaintiff's behavior on the trip exacerbated the financial issue. The judges must determine whether the defendant is responsible for the unpaid expenses and whether her actions warrant additional compensatory damages.

In the second case, a father and son are sued by their landlord after a flood caused by the son's playing in the bathtub causes significant damage to the apartment. Judge Acker questions the level of parental responsibility in this situation, while Judge DiMango questions whether the landlord is entitled to such a large sum for the damage caused. Judge Corriero considers the level of damage and the cost of repairs, and whether the landlord was negligent in maintaining the plumbing. The judges must determine who bears responsibility for the damage and who should be liable for the repair costs.

As with all episodes of Hot Bench, viewers can expect a lively and engaging courtroom drama, with the three judges bringing their unique perspectives to bear on the cases presented before them. The show's signature three-judge format offers a fresh and engaging spin on the courtroom drama genre, and helps to ensure a fair and impartial treatment of each case. With its mix of lively debate, heated exchanges, and memorable rulings, Hot Bench is a must-watch for fans of legal drama.