The People's Court Season 20 Episode 6 Taking Your Anger Out on a Car

Taking Your Anger Out on a Car is the sixth episode of the twentieth season of The People's Court. The show features real small claims cases that are presented before Judge Marilyn Milian, who presides over the court and makes the final verdict. In this particular episode, the case that is presented before the court revolves around a dispute between two parties over property damage caused to a car.

The plaintiff in the case is a young woman who claims that the defendant damaged her car and is therefore responsible for paying for the repairs. She states that on a particular night, she had parked her car on the street in front of her apartment building. However, when she came back the next day, she found that her car had been scratched and dented. She then saw that the defendant's car was also parked on the same street, and she believes that the defendant was responsible for the damage. The plaintiff estimates that the repair cost for her car is about $500.

On the other hand, the defendant denies any responsibility for the damage caused to the plaintiff's car. He states that he did not have any physical altercation with the plaintiff or her car. He claims that he did see the plaintiff's car parked on the street, but didn't notice any damage to it. Furthermore, he argues that even if he had damaged the plaintiff's car, it would have been unintentional and not enough to cause the damage that the plaintiff is alleging.

The judge hears both sides of the argument and asks for evidence to support their claims. The plaintiff presents photographs of her car showing the scratches and dents. She also points out that her car had no such damage before the night in question. However, the defendant maintains that there is no concrete evidence which proves he was responsible for the damage.

As the case progresses, it becomes clear that there are no eyewitnesses and the plaintiff's evidence is largely circumstantial. She is unable to provide any further evidence other than her testimony and the photographs she presented to the court. The defendant also argues that the plaintiff may have already had the damage on her car before the night in question, and that she is just trying to blame him for it.

After hearing both sides of the case, the judge takes some time to deliberate and then presents her verdict. She states that while the plaintiff's evidence is indeed circumstantial, it is still enough to prove that the defendant was responsible for the damage to her car. The judge rules in favor of the plaintiff and orders the defendant to pay her the full amount of $500 for the repairs to her car.

As the case comes to a close, the judge reminds both parties that they should be more responsible in their actions and that taking out aggression on someone else's property is never an acceptable solution. She hopes that the verdict will serve as a lesson for both parties and that they will work towards resolving their differences in a more civil manner in the future.

In conclusion, Taking Your Anger Out on a Car is an interesting episode of The People's Court that showcases the proceedings of a small claims case. The judge's verdict emphasizes the importance of being responsible for one's actions and the consequences that follow such actions. The show aims to educate viewers about the legal system and also encourages them to think about the consequences of their own actions.